3D printing materials

The short answer Yes: nylon is the leading engineering polymer for functional 3D printed parts. PA12 on SLS or MJF gives about 48 MPa tensile and heat deflection near 170 C with near-isotropic strength; PA6 on FDM reaches 70 MPa; carbon-filled grades reach 110 MPa. Its limits are moisture, ultraviolet light, cost and the anisotropy of filament printing. Which nylon, for which process Nylon is not one material. PA6, PA11 and PA12 behave differently, and the process changes the behaviour again. Powder-bed printing, meaning SLS and MJF, fuses unfilled PA12 into a part that is nearly isotropic because the polymer is not laid down in layers of melt. FDM printing extrudes a filament, so the part is strong in the print plane and weaker across the layer boundaries. That single difference decides more applications than the datasheet values do. Choose the grade for the property you are short of: ductility, heat or stiffness. The properties that decide the application These are the figures we check first when a customer asks whether nylon is suitable. They are typical published values for commercial powders and filaments, and every one of them shifts with grade, build orientation and moisture state. PropertyPA12 (SLS / MJF)PA6 (FDM)PA11 (SLS) Tensile strengthabout 48 MPaabout 70 MPa40 - 48 MPa Elongation at break15 - 25 percent2 - 4 percent filled30 - 200 percent Heat deflection at 0.45 MPa170 - 175 C180 - 220 C90 - 100 C Flexural modulusabout 1,700 MPa2,100 MPa800 - 1,200 MPa Moisture absorption0.25 - 1.5 percentabout 1.8 percent1 - 2 percent Anisotropyabout 1.1, near isotropic1.5 - 3.9, orientation mattersabout 1.1 Typical toleranceplus or minus 0.3 mm or 0.2 percentplus or minus 0.3 mmplus or minus 0.3 mm Indicative powder priceUSD 23 - 40 / kgUSD 30 - 60 / kg filament20 - 40 percent above PA12 Heat resistance, in real numbers Heat is where nylon earns its place in engineering work and also where the trade-offs are clearest. Unfilled PA12 holds its shape to roughly 170 to 175 C under light load, PA6 goes higher, and PA11 is the low-temperature member of the family at about 90 to 100 C. Carbon or glass filling raises stiffness dramatically but adds very little to heat resistance, which is a common misunderstanding: a carbon-filled grade chosen for heat will disappoint, while the same grade chosen for stiffness and creep resistance will not. Carbon filling buys stiffness, not heat resistance. Do not confuse the two. Moisture is the number one cause of bad parts Every nylon absorbs water from the air, and the consequences run in both directions. Wet filament prints badly: the absorbed water boils at the nozzle, producing a foamed, rough surface, micro-voids in the extrusion path and visibly weaker layer bonds. Wet parts also behave differently in service. A saturated PA6-CF part retains roughly 47 percent of its dry tensile strength, while a saturated PA612-CF part retains about 90 percent. Toughness can move the other way, because absorbed water plasticises the matrix and can nearly triple the notched impact of a glass-filled grade. The lesson is that the honest question is not which nylon, it is which environment. Drying is not optional, and it is cheap compared with reprinting a batch. Humidity also moves dimensions. A PA12 part exposed to 50 percent relative humidity for a day may grow by 0.1 to 0.2 percent, while a PA11 part can swell up to 0.4 percent. On a 200 mm part that is most of a tolerance band, so if the drawing calls for a tight fit, either account for the swell in the model or specify a sealing coat. Where nylon is the right answer Snap fits, clips and latches. Nylon bends instead of shattering, which is why it replaced ABS in most repeated-assembly features. Gears, sliders and wear surfaces. Unlubricated sliding contact suits nylon well, and carbon-filled grades add the stiffness and creep resistance a load-bearing housing needs. Ducts, manifolds and fluid routing. Nylon has good resistance to oils, fuels and many solvents, provided the service temperature stays inside the grade's limit. Brackets, drone arms and structural prototypes. The strength-to-weight ratio is the best available in polymer powder-bed printing, and MJF packs parts densely enough to make short production runs economic. Living hinges and fatigue parts. Use PA11 here rather than PA12: a documented switch from PA12 to PA11 for an integral hinge took a part from cracking at 50 to 100 cycles to surviving over 5,000. Where nylon is the wrong answer Prolonged ultraviolet exposure. Unprotected nylon fades and embrittles outdoors. Use ASA or a UV-stable material instead, or accept a coating and a shorter service life. Continuous service above the grade limit. Above roughly 120 C, unfilled PA12 creeps under load. That is a design constraint, not a printing parameter. Strong acids and oxidising agents. Nylon resists fuels and oils, not everything. Precision bearing fits and sealing faces. Powder-bed as-cast tolerance is about plus or minus 0.3 mm. Plan a machined bore rather than specifying a tolerance the process cannot hold. Cosmetic surfaces and food contact. Powder-bed parts have a uniform matte grain, and printed porosity makes them unsuitable for repeated food contact without a compliant seal. Very thin cosmetic walls. MJF needs about 0.8 to 1.0 mm minimum wall, with 0.5 mm as the fine-detail limit and 1.0 mm minimum hole diameter to avoid powder entrapment. Specifying nylon with us If you send the model, the load case, the service temperature and the environment, we will tell you whether nylon is the right call and which grade, then return a price for powder-bed or filament production with the drying and annealing steps included rather than charged as extras. Where an as-cast feature cannot hold your tolerance we will say so at DFM review and quote the machining. See SLS nylon 3D printing, FDM 3D printing and SLM metal 3D printing if the temperature limit rules polymer out. Get a nylon grade and process recommendation Scope and sources. Mechanical and thermal ranges were compiled in 2026 from an Nylon 12 versus Nylon 11 selection guide for SLS and MJF, a PA12 MJF material page with wall, hole and tolerance limits, a comparison of FDM nylon against SLS and MJF PA12 including moisture effects and a engineering guide to PA11 and PA12. Values come from technical data sheets measured on moulded specimens, so printed parts will differ, especially across layer boundaries on FDM. Moisture absorption, dimensional swell and impact response all depend on the service environment, so confirm them against your own application rather than a table.

The short answer 3D printing material reaches you through four channels: retail spools and resin bottles, industrial distributors, factory-direct orders and the qualified stock held by a manufacturing partner. The right channel depends on the feed form your process needs, the documentation your industry requires and the volume you buy. Filament is sold on 1 kg spools from about USD 15, powder in sealed drums from about USD 23. Match the feed form to the process first Before choosing a supplier, decide what the machine actually eats. This is where most first orders go wrong: resin will not feed an FDM printer, filament will not feed a powder-bed machine, and printer filament is a different product from the virgin pellet that an extruder or injection moulding press needs. The format also fixes the packaging, the shelf life and the price unit. Format before supplier: the form decides packaging, shelf life and price unit. What the materials cost Prices move with polymer grade and order size, so treat the ranges below as planning bands rather than quotations. Commodity filament bought at factory tier starts near USD 6 to 7 per kilogram for PLA and ABS and rises to around USD 13 for nylon, while the same spool bought singly at retail lands between USD 15 and 30. Resin spans a wider range because a dental or castable photopolymer is formulated very differently from a general-purpose mould resin. Nylon powder sits around USD 23 per kilogram for PA12 at volume, and metal powder is a different order of magnitude entirely, from tens of dollars per kilogram for stainless steel to several hundred for titanium. Same family, very different price: pellet, filament, resin and powder are separate markets. Material familyTypical retail bandFactory-tier bandWhat drives the spread PLA filamentUSD 15 - 22 / kgUSD 6 - 8 / kgColour, silk or matte finish, diameter tolerance PETG / ABS filamentUSD 16 - 28 / kgUSD 6 - 9 / kgImpact modification and additive package Nylon PA6 filamentUSD 30 - 60 / kgUSD 13 - 20 / kgMoisture control, carbon or glass filling SLA photopolymerUSD 25 - 90 / kgUSD 10 - 25 / kgBiocompatibility, castability, washability PA12 powderUSD 60 - 90 / kgUSD 23 - 40 / kgReuse rate, particle size distribution, lot size Metal powderUSD 90 - 700 / kgfrom USD 45 / kgAlloy, particle sphericity, oxygen content Four channels, and when each one is right The channel you pick should follow the constraint that is tightest: time, documentation, price or consistency. Time, documentation, price and consistency decide which channel wins. Retail and hobby suppliers. Best for one or two spools, unusual colours and immediate availability. Worst for lot consistency and documentation: the same colour bought twice may come from different production batches. Industrial distributors. The right choice when you need a brand you can specify by grade, plus a data sheet. They hold stock locally and typically deliver in days, but they add a margin and may not disclose the originating factory. Factory-direct. The lowest unit price and the only route to private label, custom colour matching and batch traceability. The trade is commitment: minimum order quantities commonly start at 50 spools or 500 kg for filament and can trigger staged discounts from 25 kg for powder. The qualified stock held by your manufacturing partner. When you buy parts rather than material, the supplier owns the stocking, the drying and the lot control. It is usually the cheapest option for anything under a few hundred parts because you pay for material only where it is used. Documents that separate a supplier from a reseller Ask for four documents before approving a new material, and check the dates on them. A certificate of analysis ties the delivered lot to measured properties. A technical data sheet gives the mechanical and thermal values you are designing against. A safety data sheet is required for anything with a hazard classification and is what your own EHS function will ask for. A materials declaration covering RoHS and REACH is what your customer's compliance team will ask for when the part enters an electrical, medical or automotive supply chain. A supplier who cannot produce all four on request is a reseller, not a source. MOQ, lead time and logistics Sample quantities are fast and cheap: filament and resin samples typically ship within three to seven days at unit prices that are later credited against the bulk order. Bulk filament production usually runs ten to twenty days after deposit, and powder is slower, commonly fifteen to twenty-five days, because powder is milled and sieved to order. Expedited powder delivery inside a week carries a surcharge in the region of eight to fifteen percent. Ocean freight from Asia to Europe or the United States adds roughly three to four weeks, so the calendar matters as much as the price when you are planning a production ramp. Five sourcing mistakes that cost more than the material These are the ones we see most often when a customer asks us to recover a stalled build. Comparing spool price only. Diameter tolerance, winding quality, colour repeatability and drying condition decide whether the material prints at all. A cheap spool that jams twice a day is not cheap. Ignoring the drying plan. Nylon and TPU arrive wet more often than they arrive dry. If the supplier cannot tell you the moisture content at packing, assume you must dry it yourself. Single sourcing without a second qualified grade. One approval, one factory, one shipping lane is a supply risk, not an efficiency. No lot traceability. When a cosmetic or structural defect appears three months later, an untraceable material leaves no way to isolate the affected parts. Unclear shipping terms. EXW, FOB and DDP shift duty, VAT and delivery responsibility onto very different parties. Confirm the term before payment rather than at the port. How sourcing works when we build your parts Most customers do not need to buy material at all. They send a model, a service condition and an annual quantity, and we select the grade, keep it dry, verify the lot and produce the parts. That is usually cheaper than building an in-house material inventory for anything below a few hundred units per year, and it removes the whole question of which channel to use from your desk. See FDM 3D printing, SLS nylon 3D printing and SLM metal 3D printing, or ask us to quote material and process together. Send a model and let us source the material Scope and sources. Feed forms, pack sizes and MOQ logic follow a 2026 raw material sourcing guide covering filament, resin, powder and metal grades, a bulk filament and powder price list from Asia and published spool and lead-time terms from a filament manufacturer. Price bands are indicative mid-2026 figures ex-works or at distributor tier and move with polymer index, order size, colour and packaging. They are planning ranges for budgeting, not quotations, and the documentation requirements vary by destination market, so confirm both with the supplier at order stage.

The short answer Yes, but the risk is not the spool label, it is the polymer temperature and chemistry. Every FDM print releases ultrafine particles and some volatile organic compounds: ABS and ASA add styrene, nylon adds caprolactam, polycarbonate adds bisphenol-class compounds, and uncured resin is a skin sensitiser. Match ventilation and handling to the material and most concerns disappear. What actually leaves the nozzle Heating a thermoplastic until it flows is a small thermal-degradation event. The two things that come off are ultrafine particles, defined by the US EPA as particles between 1 and 100 nanometres, and volatile organic compounds, the gases that carry most of the odour. Particles that small stay airborne for hours and travel deep into the respiratory tract, so the exposure that matters is not a single print but the accumulation over months of printing in the same closed room. The numbers are well documented. A widely cited study from Georgia Tech and UL Chemical Safety measured particle release from desktop FDM printers in the range of tens of billions of particles per minute, with most of them below 100 nanometres. That study also found that printing ABS produced particle concentrations comparable to cooking on a gas hob, while PLA produced significantly fewer. The practical conclusion is not that PLA is harmless, it is that PLA is the low end of a range, not a separate category. What determines how much is released is straightforward: hotter nozzle temperature, longer print time, more printers in the room and a smaller room all raise concentration. A fourteen-hour nylon job changes the air in a small office far more than a twenty-minute PLA bracket, even though neither is exotic. Fume control gets the attention; dust, skin contact and ingestion cause most of the preventable incidents. Risk by material The table below is the version worth keeping next to the printer. Read it as a control requirement, not as a hazard ranking: a low-risk material still needs airflow, and a high-risk material should not run in a bedroom at all. Ventilation follows the chemistry: capture at the source first, dilute the room second. Resin and powder break the rules Photopolymer resin is the one material where the hazard is not mainly airborne. Uncured resin is a skin sensitiser: repeated contact without gloves can produce a permanent allergic response, after which even brief exposure causes a reaction. The handling rules are short and non-negotiable. Nitrile gloves every time, safety glasses when opening a vat or cleaning a platform, a well-ventilated area or ducted exhaust during printing and washing, and waste resin cured solid under UV before disposal. Never pour resin or wash water down a drain. Powder-bed processes are cleaner in the room because the powder is contained, but the powder itself is a fine dust. Emptying a build chamber, brushing off a part or blasting it with compressed air puts nylon or PA12 dust into the air, so powder handling benefits from local extraction and a dust mask. Metal powder for SLM is a different category again: it is a combustible dust and is usually handled under an inert atmosphere with its own safety regime. Post-processing dust is the forgotten risk Most people control the printer and ignore the bench. Sanding a printed part releases the same polymer as a fine dust, and if the filament is carbon-fibre or glass-fibre filled, it releases chopped fibres that are abrasive to filter media and unpleasant in the lung. The controls are ordinary workshop practice: wet sanding where the geometry allows, a respirator rather than a dust mask for composite-filled grades, and extraction at the point of sanding rather than a fan across the room. Recirculating filtration is not exhaust. A HEPA filter removes particles but not gases, and activated carbon removes many gases but loads up and stops working without warning. If the printer is in a shared or occupied space and the material is ABS, ASA, polycarbonate or nylon, duct the enclosure outdoors rather than recirculating it inside the room. Food contact, nozzles and porosity Food contact is a separate problem from fumes, and it is the one that most often goes wrong quietly. An FDM part is porous by construction: the layer lines form microscopic valleys that hold food residue and moisture, and they cannot be reliably cleaned or sanitised in a dishwasher. A food-safe filament certification does not fix that, because the certification covers the pellet, not the printed geometry. Two hardware points matter as much as the filament. First, ordinary brass nozzles commonly contain a small amount of lead to improve machinability, and filament abrading against the nozzle can carry traces into the part; a stainless steel or hardened steel nozzle removes that route. Second, contamination migrates: a hotend that has run carbon-fibre or glow-in-the-dark material will carry residue into everything printed afterwards. The realistic options for food contact are a dedicated printer with a steel nozzle and a food-grade epoxy or polyurethane sealant cured fully, or a different process entirely for high-risk applications such as infant feeding items. The ranking is indicative, meant for planning ventilation rather than for a compliance decision. How we control exposure in production On our floor the rules are procedural rather than heroic, and they come from the same question every time: which exposure route is open on this job? Industrial FDM machines that run ABS and nylon sit inside enclosures with ducted exhaust, not against a window. Resin work is gloved and ventilated for the whole cycle, including the wash and cure steps where the monomer load is highest. Sanding and de-powdering happen at an extraction bench. Material safety data sheets are kept with the job card, and we will send the relevant one with a quotation when the application is regulated. What to send us If you are unsure whether a material is acceptable for your environment, send the application rather than the material name: what the part touches, how warm it gets, whether people handle it, and whether it contacts food, skin or drinking water. We will tell you when the answer is a different process, and we would rather do that at the quotation stage than after the parts ship. See FDM 3D printing, SLA resin 3D printing and SLS nylon 3D printing for the process side. Ask us to check a material for your application Scope and sources. Emission categories, ventilation levels and handling rules are compiled from published 2026 material safety and ventilation guidance, including a filament-by-filament ventilation reference, a 3D printing safety guide covering fumes, fire and filtration and a review of filament toxicity and emissions. Food-contact detail is drawn from a food-contact risk analysis for printed parts and a guide to food-safe filament and sealing. The emission ranking is a planning index, not a measurement, and it is not a substitute for your own local exposure assessment or for the material supplier data sheet.

The short answer Start from the failure you cannot accept, then answer four questions in order: service temperature, load and its direction, detail and finish, and finally quantity and cost. FDM is cheapest for directional loads, SLS and MJF nylon give isotropic strength, SLA gives the finest detail, and SLM metal works above 300 °C. The process usually decides the material. Start from the failure you cannot accept Materials are usually chosen by preference and then blamed for a failure. Inverting the order is faster: name the failure mode that would end the project, and the material follows from it. It must not deform in service - thermal, not strength, is the constraint. Anything above 80 °C leaves standard FDM plastics and points to PA12, polycarbonate, PEEK or printed metal. It must not shatter - toughness is the constraint, so PETG, ABS or TPU replaces PLA and standard resin. It must not creep or fatigue - the part is loaded continuously or cyclically, which points to SLS or MJF PA12 rather than any printed resin. It must not move out of tolerance - warping and shrinkage are the constraint, so material choice and build orientation matter as much as the process. It must not corrode or swell - chemical resistance decides it: PETG and nylon for mild chemistry, 316L stainless for aggressive service. Writing that sentence down before the material is chosen removes most of the argument, because a part rarely fails for two reasons at once. Step 1: service temperature Ask for the steady temperature, the peak temperature and how long the peak lasts. Continuous exposure at 60 °C is a harder requirement than a two minute excursion at 90 °C, and a datasheet heat deflection number tells you neither on its own. The 80 °C line is where most polymer printing stops. Read the bands as planning estimates: they mix heat deflection at 0.45 MPa with published maximum continuous use, and a loaded part fails at the bottom of each band rather than the top. The practical thresholds are that PLA and standard resin are indoor-only materials, PETG reaches about 75 °C, ABS and ASA reach about 100 °C, and PA12 from SLS or MJF sits around 170 °C. Above that, high-temperature resins and printed metal take over - 316L stainless is published for service above 300 °C. Also check the local heat: a housing next to a power supply sees a temperature the ambient specification never mentions. Step 2: load and its direction Then ask what the load is and which way it points. This is where process choice matters more than the polymer, because FDM parts are strongly anisotropic: they are built in layers, so they are weaker across the layer planes than along them. Published PLA data shows tensile strength around 35 to 40 MPa in the XY plane falling to about 31 MPa in Z, and the penalty grows with layer height and cooling. Two design responses follow. Orient the part so that the main load runs along the layers rather than pulling them apart, and prefer SLS or MJF where the load comes from several directions at once, because powder bed parts are isotropic and have no support material to remove. Printed resin is isotropic too but brittle and poor in fatigue, so it suits static fit components rather than anything cycled. If the part is safety critical or carries multi-directional structural load, the honest answer is often printed metal or conventional machining rather than a different polymer. Step 3: detail, finish and tolerance Once temperature and load are satisfied, finish usually decides the process. Tolerance, surface roughness and minimum feature size travel together, and they are a property of the process more than the material. Pick the process for tolerance, then the material for duty. FDM holds about plus or minus 0.5 mm with visible layer lines, SLA holds plus or minus 0.15 mm with a smooth surface, SLS and MJF sit around plus or minus 0.3 mm with a uniform matte finish, and SLM metal reaches plus or minus 0.1 mm before machining. If the drawing calls for tighter than plus or minus 0.1 mm, or for a surface finish below about Ra 1.6, the right move is to print for shape and finish the critical features by CNC rather than to keep hunting for a printer that will not get there. Step 4: quantity and cost Cost is last because it rarely changes which material is correct - it changes which process to use to make it. FDM is cheapest for one-offs and directional loads, SLA sits one tier up, SLS and MJF are priced for functional quantities, and metal printing is in a different category again. The unit cost is driven by machine time, material, support or powder handling, and post-processing labour, not by the spool price. Five minutes of support removal at a 15 USD per hour shop rate adds about 1.25 USD to every part, which for a 1000 piece run is more than the material difference between two polymers. That is also why printing stops making sense at some volume: once the geometry is stable and the quantity is in the thousands, tooling for injection moulding or die casting usually beats any printing route on unit cost, even though it has a higher entry cost. The four questions as a checklist Run them in order and most options disappear by question three. In practice the sequence closes fast. Temperature removes the unsuitable polymers, load direction decides between a directional process and an isotropic one, detail decides whether the process can hold the drawing, and quantity decides between printing and tooling. When the answers contradict each other - a tight tolerance with a high temperature, for instance - the resolution is usually a hybrid route: print or cast the form, then machine the critical features. Material selection at SOMI Custom Parts We run FDM, SLA, SLS, MJF, SLM and injection moulding, so the recommendation is not tied to one process. Send the model with the service temperature, the load case and the annual quantity and we will come back with the material, the process and the price, including a note when a moulded part is cheaper over your volume: see FDM 3D printing, SLS 3D printing or SLM metal 3D printing. Ask for a material and process recommendation Scope and sources. Process tolerances, lead times and material temperature bands are typical commercial values compiled in 2026 and were cross-checked against a functional 3D printing guide covering failure modes and process choice, a cross-process comparison of FDM, SLA, SLS, MJF and SLM and a review of engineering and high performance 3D printing materials. Temperature values mix heat deflection at 0.45 MPa with maximum continuous use temperature, so they are not directly comparable between processes. Tolerance, unit cost and lead time all depend on geometry, quantity and finish, so confirm them at quotation rather than from a table.

The short answer Yes, in three ways: multi-material printing with a second extruder or a material unit, soluble or breakaway support pairs, and rigid-plus-flexible combinations. The limit is the interface, not the printer. Paired materials must share a nozzle and bed temperature window, so PLA with PVA, PETG with BVOH and ABS with HIPS work, while PLA with ABS does not bond reliably. Three different things "mixing materials" can mean The question usually means one of three quite different processes, and the constraints are not the same for any of them. Multi-material printing means one model, printed in one job, with two polymers laid down by two extruders, an independent dual extruder setup, or a single-nozzle material unit that swaps filament between layers. This is what most people picture: a rigid housing with a flexible grip, or a part in two colours. Blending or compounding means mixing polymers before printing. Carbon fibre or glass filled nylon, impact modified PLA and wood filled filament are all examples. This is a material choice rather than a print strategy, and the resulting spool has its own datasheet and its own nozzle requirements. Hybrid parts combine printed plastic with another material or process: brass threaded inserts pressed into printed bosses, a machined aluminium plate bolted to a printed housing, or a printed substrate that is later overmoulded. These are usually the right answer when the joint carries load, because they do not depend on polymer to polymer bonding. Pairs that work, and pairs that do not Three rules decide which combinations are printable. The materials must share a nozzle window, because each extruder prints at its own temperature but they feed the same part. They must share a bed temperature, since one bed serves both. And a soluble support must not degrade at the primary material print temperature, or it will clog the nozzle and stop dissolving. Validated pairs, not preferences: the window has to overlap. The fourth column holds the failures. PVA is the natural support for PLA because both print around 190 to 220 °C, and PVA crystallises above roughly 225 °C, which is why it is only workable at the bottom of the PETG window. BVOH is faster to dissolve but carbonises above about 215 °C, so it pairs with PLA and PETG rather than ABS. HIPS is the standard soluble support for ABS, ASA and PC-ABS because they share a 230 to 260 °C window and a 95 to 110 °C bed. Cross the families and the pairing collapses: PLA with ABS fails on both the 40 °C print temperature gap and the 50 °C bed gap, so the interface never bonds and the part warps around it. Soluble support is not always worth it. For most parts a tuned breakaway interface at roughly 0.2 mm clearance with a dense interface layer leaves an acceptable surface, and the extra filament changeover time, prime tower scrap and 12 to 18 hours of soaking rarely pay for themselves. Soluble supports earn their place on internal channels that cannot be reached by hand and on geometries where support removal would otherwise dominate the labour cost. Soluble supports: how long the soak takes Dissolution time is the practical constraint people underestimate, because it is workshop hours rather than machine hours. Heat and agitation matter more than the material choice. A dense PVA support block inside a narrow cavity can soak for 12 to 18 hours in still water at room temperature; a stirred or heated bath at 40 to 60 °C brings that down to 2 to 4 hours, which is why agitation is standard practice. BVOH dissolves fastest and costs the most. HIPS needs d-limonene, which is neither drain-safe nor cheap, and the spent solvent has to go to hazardous waste collection - a workflow cost that rarely appears in the comparison table but does appear in the quote. Thin support walls of one or two perimeters dissolve far faster than solid blocks, and printing the bulk of the support in the primary material with only a soluble interface layer is the usual compromise. Rigid plus flexible: the combination most people want Pairing a stiff material with a soft one is the commercially useful case: a hard shell with a soft grip, or a rigid bracket with an integrated damper. PLA with TPU at 95A shore hardness and PETG with TPU are both printed in production, and both rely on mechanical interlock rather than chemical bonding. That distinction decides the design. Two dissimilar polymers do not form a continuous interface, so the joint holds by geometry: dovetails, through holes filled by the second material, ribs that the flexible polymer wraps around. A butt joint between two materials peels apart under flexing no matter how well the printer is calibrated. Where the joint has to carry real load, a printed insert pocket plus a mechanical fastener or a brass heat set insert is stronger than any material pair, and it is what we recommend first. Why the interface is the weakest point Every FDM part is anisotropic - it is weaker across the layer planes than along them - and a multi-material part adds a second discontinuity where the two polymers meet. Three effects stack up there. Thermal mismatch. The pair is laid down at different temperatures into the same part, so one material is already below its own bonding range while the other is being deposited. The interface cools unevenly and residual stress concentrates in it. Shrinkage difference. ABS shrinks around 0.8 percent on cooling while PLA shrinks 0.2 to 0.5 percent, so a mixed part can pull itself out of tolerance even when each material alone would hold it. Moisture in the support. PVA and BVOH absorb water quickly; wet support pops, extrudes unevenly and leaves a rough interface that neither bonds well nor dissolves cleanly. The design consequence is simple: use multi-material printing for function where the load is light, for colour, for grip and for support, and use inserts or fasteners wherever the joint is structural. From model to printed mixed part Pair first, print second: sequence errors are what fail the part. Each step has one common failure. Pairing fails when the temperature windows are checked only at the nozzle and not at the bed. Assignment fails when two materials sit in one body, which leaves the slicer no way to route them. Printing fails without a prime tower or ooze shield, because the inactive nozzle drools across the part and contaminates the interface. Clean-up fails when the support interface gap is too tight: too close welds the support to the part, too far lets the overhang sag. Dial in the interface layer height before printing anything you have to deliver. Multi-material and hybrid parts at SOMI Custom Parts We print multi-material FDM parts with soluble supports, and above prototype volumes we will usually steer a two-material part towards overmoulding or insert moulding, where the bond is formed by the process rather than by the printer. Send the model with the function of each zone and we will say which route is cheaper at your quantity: see FDM 3D printing, plastic injection molding or SLA 3D printing. Ask which material pair fits your part Scope and sources. Pairing rules, dissolve times and cost figures are compiled from manufacturer technical data for soluble support materials and were cross-checked against an operational guide to HIPS and PVA support, a peer reviewed study of dual extrusion with HIPS and PVA and a published PVA and HIPS filament specification. Dissolve times depend on support density, wall count, bath temperature and agitation, so treat them as ranges and test a coupon. Interface strength between dissimilar polymers is not covered by any single published standard, so structural joints in mixed-material parts should be verified by test rather than assumed.

The short answer Avoid PLA above roughly 45 to 50 °C in service, under sustained load, outdoors in direct sunlight, where repeated impact is expected, or in contact with solvents. An unprotected PLA part can last over 10 years indoors and still crack within 3 to 6 months in sun and rain. PETG covers toughness, ASA covers outdoor, ABS and polycarbonate cover heat, SLS PA12 covers load. Six conditions that rule PLA out PLA is not a weak material - it is a narrow one. Its useful window is roughly room temperature, dry, low load and low impact. When any of the conditions below appears in the requirements, the material changes rather than the design. Service above 45 to 50 °C. Heat deflection is 50 to 57 °C at 0.45 MPa on an unloaded bar, so a loaded part starts moving below that. A parked car interior, a shelf in a conservatory or a housing next to a power supply all cross the line. Sustained load, even at room temperature. PLA creeps under constant force, which means a bracket or a mount slowly changes shape over weeks without any visible warning. Direct sunlight. UV exposure fades colour within about a month and breaks down the polymer chains over the following seasons, so an outdoor part loses strength before it visibly fails. Impact and drops. At 3 to 5 kJ/m2 notched impact, PLA absorbs very little energy, and it fails along the layer planes where bonding is weakest. Solvents, fuels and aggressive cleaners. PLA swells or dissolves in chlorinated solvents and several oils, and it cannot be acetone smoothed because acetone attacks the surface. Repeated flexing or snap fits in service. With 3 to 6 percent elongation and no yield plateau, fatigue cracks form at the hinge and the part snaps rather than relaxing. How a PLA part actually fails The failure mode matters as much as the limit. Each of these four attacks produces a different symptom, and in a real application they arrive in sequence rather than one at a time. Heat and load usually arrive long before UV does. Heat comes first and works slowly: the part does not melt, it loses stiffness and then deforms under whatever load it is already carrying. Creep is the quietest failure of all, because a bracket that sags 2 mm in three months looks like a design error rather than a material one. UV is the slowest and most environment dependent; impact is the fastest and most visible. The practical consequence is that a PLA failure is usually a distorted part rather than a broken one, and it is often blamed on the printer rather than the material choice. What to switch to, by requirement Find the requirement that PLA fails, and the replacement follows. RequirementMaterial to useThe number behind the switch Up to 80 °C, with toughnessPETGHeat deflection 70 to 80 °C, impact 8 to 12 kJ/m2 Up to about 95 °C indoorsABS or PCHeat deflection 95 to 100 °C for ABS, 130 to 150 °C for PC Outdoors with UVASASame heat range as ABS, without yellowing or embrittlement Impact and dropsPETG, ABS or TPU15 to 25 kJ/m2 for ABS against 3 to 5 for PLA Load, fatigue and wearSLS or MJF PA12Isotropic strength and 160 to 180 °C heat deflection Chemical exposurePETG, PA12 or 316LResistant to acids, bases and fuels where PLA swells Above 150 °CPEEK, PEI or printed metalContinuous service up to about 250 °C for PEEK Environment decides how long a PLA part lasts The same printed part can have a service life of three months or more than a decade, depending entirely on where it lives. Reproduction of that difference is worth doing before a PLA design is signed off, because the material itself has not changed. Same filament, three orders of magnitude of difference. Two mechanisms drive it. Moisture is absorbed slowly and then accelerates chain scission, and heat multiplies the effect: the published lifetime discussions put a cool, dark, dry room above 10 years, a normal office at 5 to 10 years, and a hot humid room at 2 to 3 years. Outdoors is not one environment but three - shaded outdoor service with occasional UV can reach about 4 years, while a part in direct sun and rain can be unusable within a single season. Roughly, every five degrees of extra temperature halves the life of the part. If you must stay with PLA Sometimes the print settings, the colour or the short lead time matter more than the environment, and the part is worth protecting deliberately. What actually helps: Anneal at 90 to 100 °C with a slow ramp to raise crystallinity, which lifts heat deflection towards about 95 °C. Budget 1 to 3 percent shrinkage and support the part during the cycle. Coat it for UV. A clear acrylic or polyurethane spray blocks most of the UV that breaks the chains. Sealed and coated indoor parts are reported to last beyond a decade. Use more material, not more infill. Walls of 1.2 to 2.2 mm and three to five perimeters carry load far better than a dense infill inside thin walls. Print slower for layer adhesion. Around 40 to 60 mm/s gives the layers time to bond; running past roughly 90 mm/s turns a solid part into a brittle one. Orient the load across the layers, not along the layer boundaries, and choose an impact modified or annealable grade instead of standard PLA where the part will be handled. Add a safety factor to the design and keep the part away from electronics heat, direct sun and any sustained load path. The "compostable" claim is not an outdoor benefit It is worth separating two ideas that get merged in filament marketing. PLA is industrially compostable, meaning it reaches about 90 percent conversion in roughly 12 weeks under EN 13432 conditions - around 58 °C with active microbial activity. A home compost heap rarely reaches those conditions and will not break the part down on any useful timescale, and in landfill, where oxygen and temperature are both low, PLA persists for decades. So the end-of-life benefit exists, but only in the right facility, and it says nothing about how the part survives a garden wall for a summer. Choosing the right material at SOMI Custom Parts We print PLA, PETG, ABS, ASA, TPU and PA12 and we would rather move a part to the right polymer than replace it twice. Tell us the highest temperature, the load, and whether the part sees sun or chemicals, and we will come back with the material and the price: see FDM 3D printing, SLS 3D printing or SLA 3D printing. Ask which material your part actually needs Scope and sources. Service life and degradation figures are indicative ranges reported for unprotected PLA parts and were cross-checked against published PLA durability and lifespan data by environment, a review of PLA disadvantages and annealing behaviour and a study of PLA strength, brittleness and heat treatment. Lifespan depends on UV dose, humidity, load and part geometry, so treat the bands as planning estimates rather than test results. Temperature values are heat deflection at 0.45 MPa and real service limits are lower under load.

The short answer ABS is the tougher and far more heat resistant material: heat deflection of 95 to 100 °C against 50 to 57 °C for PLA, and 15 to 25 kJ/m2 notched impact against 3 to 5. PLA is stiffer, cheaper and prints without an enclosure. ABS needs a 95 to 110 °C bed, an enclosure and ventilation, and it warps on large parts. Head to head: the numbers that decide it Most ABS versus PLA arguments are really arguments about one property. On a desk at room temperature, PLA is the stiffer and easier material. In a warm, loaded or impact-prone environment, ABS is the answer. The six properties below settle the majority of real decisions. One row usually decides the material before the rest are read. PropertyPLAABS Tensile strength45 to 60 MPa35 to 45 MPa Stiffness, Young’s modulus3.3 to 3.5 GPa2.0 to 2.4 GPa Elongation at break3 to 6 percent10 to 20 percent Notched impact strength3 to 5 kJ/m215 to 25 kJ/m2 Heat deflection at 0.45 MPa50 to 57 °C95 to 100 °C Glass transition55 to 60 °C100 to 105 °C Print temperature190 to 220 °C230 to 260 °C Bed temperature50 to 60 °C, optional95 to 110 °C, required EnclosureNot requiredRequired for parts over about 50 mm WarpingNegligibleHigh, about 0.8 percent shrink FumesLow, faintly sweetStyrene; ventilation is mandatory UV and outdoorPoor; fades and embrittlesPoor; yellows, use ASA instead Post-processingSand and paintAcetone smoothing, solvent welding Price per kilogramUSD 15 to 25USD 18 to 30 Strength is not toughness The most common selection mistake is reading the tensile row and stopping there. PLA wins that row, yet a PLA part is the one that cracks when it is dropped. The two properties measure different things: tensile strength is the stress a material carries before it breaks, and toughness is the energy it absorbs getting there. The stress-strain curves show why. PLA rises almost linearly and then terminates at 3 to 6 percent strain with no yielding, so all the energy arrives in one brittle event. ABS yields at around 35 MPa and then draws: the specimen necks and extends to 10 to 20 percent strain while absorbing energy continuously. Notched impact testing separates the two even further, with ABS five to eight times tougher. A practical version of that test - a 3 mm printed enclosure dropped one metre onto concrete - cracks PLA most of the time and usually dents ABS. Toughness, not strength, predicts the dropped part. Heat is where ABS separates Nothing else about these two materials differs by as much as heat resistance. The heat deflection temperatures are roughly 40 to 45 °C apart, and that gap covers the entire range of everyday warm environments: a car interior in summer, a shelf near a window, a housing next to a power supply, a part above a motor. Above 60 °C the choice is no longer PLA against ABS; it is ABS against the rest. Two details matter as much as the headline number. First, heat deflection is measured on an unloaded specimen at 0.45 MPa, so a loaded PLA part starts to move below the bottom of its band - a black PLA bracket on a dashboard sees 60 to 70 °C and sags within hours. Second, PLA creeps under load even at room temperature, so a shelf bracket can distort over months without ever getting hot. ABS behaves far better in both cases, which is why functional enclosures and anything near a heat source default to it. Printing them: enclosure, ventilation and warping Printable is not the same as easy. PLA prints on an open-frame machine with a 50 to 60 °C bed and tolerates imperfect settings. ABS needs a 95 to 110 °C bed and, for anything larger than a benchy, a chamber held around 40 to 50 °C so the part cools slowly and evenly. Without that, ABS shrinks about 0.8 percent as it cools, thermal stress builds, and corners lift or layers split. It also emits styrene during printing, so a ventilated or filtered enclosure is a working requirement rather than a preference. The return on that effort is post-processing. ABS can be vapour smoothed with acetone into a glossy, sealed surface, solvent welded with the same liquid, and drilled, tapped and machined much like a conventional plastic. PLA can be sanded and painted, but it has no equivalent smoothing route, and sanding generates enough friction heat to soften it if you are heavy handed. Which one wins for which job The part mustChooseWhy Be cheap and fast to iteratePLALowest material cost, no enclosure, fewest failed prints Hold a static load indoorsPLA, or PETG if loaded long termHighest stiffness at room temperature, but PLA creeps Survive being droppedABSFive times the notched impact energy of PLA Sit near heat, up to about 95 °CABS or ASAHeat deflection 95 to 100 °C against 50 to 57 °C Live outdoorsASA, not ABSABS yellows and embrittles in UV; ASA is stabilised Look glossy without paintingABSAcetone vapour smoothing; no PLA equivalent Be a smooth-looking concept modelPLASharpest detail and the widest finish range Where each one fails PLA in a hot car. Softening starts around 55 to 60 °C, so a dashboard part distorts under its own weight in a single summer afternoon. PLA under a steady load. Creep at room temperature means a bracket or a phone mount slowly changes shape while looking fine for weeks. ABS on an open printer. Differential cooling warps the part and splits layers, so the printed strength lands below the datasheet even when the spool is good. ABS outdoors. UV yellowing and embrittlement arrive within a season or two; ASA exists precisely for that duty. ABS without ventilation. Styrene exposure is a health issue, not a smell complaint, and it is the reason many workshops run ABS behind a filter. Consider PETG before either one. PETG sits between them at 70 to 80 °C heat deflection with 8 to 12 kJ/m2 impact, prints without an enclosure and costs about the same as ABS. Where the requirement is "tougher than PLA but not 100 °C", PETG usually answers it with less printer hardware and less warping risk. Choosing between ABS and PLA at SOMI Custom Parts We print both, and the recommendation comes from the service environment rather than the price list. Send the model with the temperature, load and UV exposure the part will actually see and we will tell you where PLA is enough, where PETG covers it more cheaply than ABS, and where an engineered polymer or nylon is the honest answer: see FDM 3D printing, SLS 3D printing or SLA 3D printing. Send a part for an ABS or PLA recommendation Scope and sources. Mechanical and thermal values are typical published ranges for commercial filament in 2026, cross-checked against a mechanical comparison of PLA, PETG and ABS with tensile and notched impact data, a PLA versus ABS printing guide and a cost and performance review of FDM materials. Printed properties are orientation dependent and fall between layers, so treat the figures as planning ranges. Where a part carries a structural, thermal or regulatory requirement, verify it on printed coupons in the final orientation.

The short answer PLA, or polylactic acid, is a bio-based thermoplastic printed at 190 to 220 °C. Its advantages are cost at about USD 18 to 28 per kilogram, printing with no enclosure, minimal warping, sharp detail and the widest colour range in FDM. Its limit is heat: standard PLA softens near 55 to 60 °C and creeps under sustained load. What PLA is, and why it prints so easily PLA is a polyester built from lactic acid, which is fermented from plant starch - usually corn, sometimes sugar cane or sugar beet. That feedstock is why the material is called bio-based, and it also explains how the polymer behaves: it melts across a narrow window, shrinks very little as it cools, and has a glass transition temperature close to the temperature of a hot car interior. The processing numbers are the reason PLA has a reputation for being forgiving. It melts between roughly 150 and 170 °C and prints at 190 to 220 °C, so a standard hotend is enough and no all-metal high-temperature path is needed. Shrinkage on cooling is only about 0.2 to 0.5 percent, so large flat parts stay down on an unheated bed instead of peeling at the corners. No enclosure, no heated chamber and no special ventilation are required, which is the single biggest reason almost everyone starts here. Four steps, none of which needs heated hardware. The advantages, in the order they usually matter The advantages below are all real, but they do not carry equal weight. On most parts the first four decide the material and the rest only confirm the choice. Grade choice moves tensile strength; it moves heat resistance much less. Lowest cost per kilogram. Commercial PLA runs about USD 18 to 28 per kilogram, below ABS and PETG, and far below nylon, polycarbonate or any engineering polymer. Easiest to print. Low melt temperature, low shrinkage and reliable first-layer adhesion mean the two classic FDM failures, warping and delamination, are rare. Sharp detail and good accuracy. PLA holds fine features, small text and thin walls better than most FDM materials, so small parts come out crisp rather than blobby. Widest colour and finish range. Standard, matte, silk, transparent, wood filled, metal filled and carbon filled variants all exist, which matters when the part is a visual prototype that has to look right in a review. Low odour indoors. PLA prints with a faint sweet smell instead of the styrene fumes of ABS, so it can run in an office or a design studio without extraction. Easy to finish. PLA sands, primes and paints well and does not attack most coatings. It cannot be acetone smoothed, which is a limitation rather than an advantage. Plant-based feedstock. The carbon comes from crops rather than oil. Treat the sustainability claim carefully, because end-of-life behaviour is not what most people assume. The numbers behind those advantages These are the figures worth quoting in a design review. They are typical published values for commercial filament at 23 °C, and print settings and grade shift them by a few percent either way. PropertyTypical PLA valueWhat it means for a part Nozzle temperature190 to 220 °CStandard hotend, open frame printer Bed temperature50 to 60 °C, optionalRuns on printers without a heated bed Density1.24 g/cm3Slightly lighter than ABS at 1.04 Tensile strength45 to 60 MPaHigher than ABS at room temperature Tensile modulus3.3 to 3.5 GPaStiff, deflects little under load Elongation at break3 to 6 percentAlmost no stretch before failure Notched impact3 to 5 kJ/m2Brittle; shatters instead of bending Glass transition55 to 60 °CSoftening begins at this temperature Heat deflection50 to 57 °C at 0.45 MPaLoaded parts sag below the glass transition Print shrinkage0.2 to 0.5 percentLow warping on large flat geometry Filament toleranceplus or minus 0.02 to 0.03 mmConsistent extrusion on a 0.4 mm nozzle Price per kilogramUSD 18 to 28Cheapest material in the FDM range Where PLA stops working PLA is a geometry and fit material, not a service material. The list below is what we check before agreeing to print a functional PLA part. Anything warmer than about 50 to 60 °C. A car dashboard, a conservatory shelf or an enclosure next to electronics all exceed the glass transition, and a loaded PLA part will distort rather than fail cleanly. Sustained load, even at room temperature. PLA creeps: a bracket under constant force slowly sags over weeks or months, so the failure appears as a changed geometry rather than a break. Repeated impact. At 3 to 5 kJ/m2 notched, PLA absorbs very little energy, and the part fails across the layer planes where adhesion is lowest. Outdoors in sunlight. UV fades colour within weeks and embrittles the polymer over a longer period; add rain and thermal cycling and the part can be beyond use in a single season. Solvents, fuels and cleaning agents. Chlorinated solvents, some oils and aggressive cleaners attack PLA, and acetone smoothing - the standard ABS trick - is not available for it. Repeated flexing and snap fits. Fatigue cracks form quickly because the material has almost no plastic deformation range, so living hinges snap off rather than bend. "Compostable" does not mean it degrades where you leave it. PLA needs industrial composting conditions, typically 58 °C with active microbial activity, to reach 90 percent conversion in about 12 weeks under EN 13432. A home compost heap is far slower, and in landfill PLA persists for decades. Bio-based feedstock is a real advantage at end of life in the right facility, not in the garden. PLA grades and what each one changes Standard PLA is rarely the only option. Filament makers adjust toughness, finish and heat resistance with additives, and knowing what each grade actually shifts prevents the common mistake of buying a prettier filament to solve a mechanical problem. Six grades, one property each - finish changes do not fix strength or heat. Impact modified grades are the useful ones for functional parts. Adding a PBAT type elastomer drops tensile strength to roughly 30 to 40 MPa but raises elongation to around 50 percent, which turns a part that shatters into one that deforms and recovers. That is the right trade for clips, covers and snap fits. Composite grades move the other way: wood, metal or carbon fillers raise stiffness and improve tactile and cosmetic character, but they are more brittle and most fillers require a hardened steel nozzle because they abrade brass. Can annealing raise the heat limit? Partly, and with a cost. PLA can be heat treated to raise crystallinity, which lifts the heat deflection temperature substantially - towards roughly 95 °C for well formulated material - but the same crystallisation shrinks the part by about 1 to 3 percent and can distort it unless it is supported during the cycle. In practice there are two different treatments. A stress-relief cycle at 50 to 60 °C for several hours removes internal print stress and improves dimensional stability without changing appearance, and most print services offer it. A crystallising anneal at 90 to 100 °C is the one that raises heat resistance, and it needs a ramp of an hour or more, a support medium such as salt or gypsum to hold fine features, and allowance for the shrinkage in the model. High-temperature PLA grades are formulated with nucleating agents specifically for this second route. If the part simply has to work at 70 °C in service, choosing PETG, ABS or ASA is cheaper than redesigning around an anneal. Printed PLA parts at SOMI Custom Parts We print PLA where it is the right material - form and fit checks, jigs, covers, display parts and low-load brackets - and we will say when the service environment means a different polymer is the honest answer. Send a model with the intended use and we will come back with the material, the print settings that matter and a price: see FDM 3D printing, SLS 3D printing or SLA 3D printing. Ask whether PLA is right for your part Scope and sources. Property values above are typical published figures for commercial PLA filament in 2026 and were cross-checked against polymer data for polylactide as a material family, a published PLA 3D printing technical profile and documented disadvantages of printing with PLA including annealing behaviour. Real printed properties depend on machine, nozzle, layer height, build orientation and infill, so treat every number here as a planning range. Where a part carries a load or a temperature requirement, confirm it on printed test coupons rather than on a datasheet.

The short answer PLA, PETG, ABS or ASA, TPU and Nylon PA12 cover most printed parts. PLA is cheapest and easiest but softens near 50 to 60 degrees Celsius. PETG is the functional default at 70 to 80 degrees. ABS and ASA reach 80 to 105 degrees, with ASA for outdoor use. TPU bends and seals; Nylon PA12 carries load and heat. The six materials that cover most parts Everything else is a variation on these. The table below pairs each one with the property that usually decides the choice, because price and strength are rarely the deciding factor on their own. Six materials, one decision each: heat, toughness, flexibility, wear or stiffness. PropertyPLAPETGABS / ASATPUNylon PA12 Tensile strength37 to 50 MPa40 to 55 MPa30 to 50 MPa20 to 50 MPa40 to 60 MPa Service temperature50 to 60 C70 to 80 C80 to 105 C60 to 80 C100 to 170 C Print temperature190 to 220 C230 to 250 C240 to 260 C220 to 240 C250 to 280 C Cost per kgUSD 20 to 30USD 30 to 45USD 25 to 35USD 40 to 70USD 50 to 80 Main weaknessHeat and creepLower stiffnessWarps, needs enclosureSlow to printAbsorbs moisture What each material is actually for PLA is the default starting point: it prints cleanly on any machine, holds sharp detail, sands and paints well, and costs the least. Its glass transition sits around 50 to 60 degrees Celsius, so a part left in a hot vehicle or near a heat source will creep under load. Treat PLA as a proof-of-concept material rather than a final one. PETG is where functional printing should start. It is stronger than PLA with better temperature resistance, tolerates mild chemical exposure without crazing, and is slightly flexible, which lets it absorb impact rather than crack. Layer adhesion is better than ABS without the warping, and it needs no enclosure. For brackets, clips, enclosures and general mechanical parts it is the sensible default when PLA is not strong enough. ABS and ASA are the heat-resistant pair. ABS tolerates higher impact and temperature but warps and gives off fumes, so it wants an enclosed, ventilated machine. ASA is the UV-stabilised version: it holds its properties after months of sunlight where standard ABS yellows and embrittles, which makes it the choice for anything that lives outdoors. Both sand and vapour-smooth well, which matters for cosmetic parts. TPU is a sidestep rather than an upgrade - it is chosen when the requirement is flexibility, not strength. It stretches beyond 200 percent elongation in the softer grades, which suits gaskets, seals, grips, strain reliefs and vibration dampers. It prints slowly, and a direct-drive extruder makes the flexible path much shorter and more reliable. Nylon PA12 is the engineering tier. It resists fatigue and wear far better than PETG, which is what makes it the material for gears, living hinges, snap tabs and load-bearing brackets. The catch is moisture: nylon is hygroscopic, so it must be dried before printing and stored dry, or the part comes out with voids and reduced stiffness. Surface finish on FDM nylon is also rougher than PETG or PLA. Printing nylon as SLS powder raises the service temperature to roughly 150 to 170 degrees and removes the need for supports entirely, at a higher cost per part. Above these materials sit the composites and metals. Carbon fibre and glass filled nylon reach 70 to 110 MPa and add stiffness rather than toughness, which makes them the choice for frames and jigs where deflection matters; they need a hardened nozzle. Metal printing such as 316L via laser powder bed sits around 540 MPa - roughly ten times PLA - and is a different process with a different cost structure and post-processing route, not a filament upgrade. How hot a part can work Temperature is the requirement that most often surprises people, because a material that is strong at room temperature can lose most of its usable stiffness well below the temperature of boiling water. PLA and SLS nylon sit at opposite ends - a 110 degree gap that no infill setting can close. What each material costs Price per kilogram is a poor guide on its own, because a spool that fails three times costs more than the material saved. The useful way to read the chart below is to buy the cheapest material that satisfies the temperature and load case, and step up only when a specific requirement forces it. Roughly a four times spread between PLA and carbon fibre nylon. Choosing by the part, not by the printer The part mustChooseDo not choose Sit on a desk as a form studyPLA or standard resinEngineering polymers on cost grounds Live outdoors in sunlightASA, PETG or SLS nylonPLA or unstabilised ABS Absorb impact without crackingPETG, TPU or nylonStandard resin, PLA Bend, seal or gripTPU at the right hardnessPLA, ABS, polycarbonate Carry load at temperatureNylon PA12, polycarbonate or CF nylonPLA, PETG Survive repeated flexingNylon PA12PLA, which is brittle Where each material fails PLA in a warm environment. Softening starts around 50 to 60 degrees; a part under load will creep rather than fail cleanly, so the failure appears as a distorted geometry. ABS without an enclosure. Differential cooling warps the part and splits layers, so the printed properties come in below the datasheet. Nylon with wet filament. Absorbed moisture turns to steam in the nozzle, causing bubbles, voids and a visibly rough surface with reduced stiffness. TPU on a long bowden path. Flexible filament buckles before it reaches the nozzle, which shows up as inconsistent extrusion rather than a clean failure. Composites as a toughness fix. Chopped fibre increases stiffness and reduces flexibility, so a part designed to bend will crack instead. A printed material is not the same as a moulded one. Printing builds a part in layers, so strength depends on build orientation and is lower across the layer planes than along them. Where a part will be loaded in one direction, orientation is a design decision, not a slicer default. Printed prototypes and production parts at SOMI Custom Parts We print SLA, SLS, FDM, MJF and SLM parts for prototypes, jigs and low-volume production, and we will say when the geometry or the load case means a moulded or machined part is the cheaper answer over the volume you are planning. Send a model and a quantity: see FDM 3D printing, SLS 3D printing, or open a project through our inquiry form. Ask which printing material fits your part Scope and sources. Tensile strengths, service temperatures and price ranges above are typical published values for commercial 3D printing materials in 2026 and were cross-checked against public material comparisons such as a cross-process 3D printing material comparison and the printed properties published for desktop FDM filaments. Measured properties depend on machine, nozzle, layer height, build orientation and infill, so treat these as planning ranges rather than specifications. Where a part carries a functional or regulatory requirement, that should be confirmed on printed test coupons rather than on a datasheet.